Delta Force Personal & Family Defense

» UN Gun Grab Follows State Department Plan Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, July 16, 2012

The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.

The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.

Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”

Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

via www.infowars.com

Is this real? There was a Utube video with this link. I have not had a chance to check-out its veracity, and I may not get to it. You need to get used to checking it out yourself. A good place to start is snopes.com, but you need a couple of other unbiased sources to be considered legit.
This appears legit to me, as it is what we have been screaming about for so long regarding the threat of a UN Arms-Treaty.
I've said it before and I will say it now--Get us out of the UN! A world government will NOT follow the pattern of our American Government.

» UN Gun Grab Follows State Department Plan Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!

Paul Joseph Watson
Infowars.com
Monday, July 16, 2012

The UN Arms Trade Treaty that has been identified by observers as a flagrant threat to the second amendment and which Barack Obama is determined to sign has its roots in a 1961 State Department memorandum which explains how the United Nations will oversee “complete disarmament” of the American people under the ruse of preventing war.

The UN Arms Treaty has caused so much controversy because it outlines a plan to target “all types of conventional weapons, notably including small arms and light weapons,” according to Forbes’ Larry Bell.

Former US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton also warns that the agreement “is trying to act as though this is really just a treaty about international arms trade between nation states, but there is no doubt that the real agenda here is domestic firearms control.”

A letter sent last month by 130 Republican House members to President Obama argued that the treaty should be rejected because it infringes on the “fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms”. The letter adds that “…the U.N.’s actions to date indicate that the ATT is likely to pose significant threats to our national security, foreign policy, and economic interests as well as our constitutional rights.”

Using the rhetoric of the threat post by terrorists, insurgents and “international crime syndicates,” the UN is busy trying to imply that all weapons are somehow involved in illegal activity on a global scale and should therefore be controlled and regulated by a global authority.

via www.infowars.com

Check it out. I have nto verified the veracity of this pied and accompanying video, but you need to learn to do this for yourself. Start with Snopes.com and get two other reliable sources to verify to proper journalistic standards.

Gun owners enter the fight of our lives | The Daily Caller

The NRA has been saying all along that Barack Obama would unleash an assault on our Second Amendment freedoms if he won a second term. It sure didn’t take long for him to prove us right.

Just hours after Obama won re-election last Tuesday, his administration endorsed a new effort by the global gun grabbers at the United Nations to draft a gun ban treaty early next year. The official starting point for the new talks is last year’s failed draft, which contains provisions that threaten our sovereign right to keep and bear arms through an international gun registration scheme.

And not long after Obama floated the idea of banning semi-automatic firearms, we learned that California Senator Dianne Feinstein was working with the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms, and Explosives to draft new legislation that would ban semi-automatic rifles, shotguns and handguns, so-called “high capacity” magazines, and rifles and shotguns with pistol grips. Reportedly, Feinstein wants to make it illegal not just to sell your guns and magazines, but to leave them behind in your will.

Not surprisingly, the lights had hardly gone out at

via dailycaller.com

Slide Fire™ - Superior Performance Gun Stocks

SEE IT IN ACTION

Airing on the Discovery Channel Network™, one of the most popular shows on television, American Guns, picked up one of our Slide Fire™ Premium Stocks and put it to the test.

via www.slidefire.com

Bump-firing is not a new thing--but this stock design is. It ergonomically maximizes and controls your firearm's ability to safely bump-fire as fast as your trigger can be pulled. Used in short bursts, I can see this ability greatly leveling the field for LEO's facing criminal firepower. It can assist homeowners in defense of their families against multiple burglars and holds promise of greater security during periods of natural disasters and anarchy due to a collapsed economy or social unrest. Although I don't personally feel that rapid fire is a necessary option, it may be a desirable one in some cases. It's greatest value, however, may be in adding enjoyment to the activity for which most black rifles are used--recreational shooting.
Such recreational shooting may be equated to swimming. Swimming is a useful and fun recreational activity--but it also has the potential of one day saving yours or others lives. although strong swimming skills are required by our military's most versatile and elite special forces--and may similarly be abused by criminal elements to perform the odd-crime here or there--it just doesn't happen that often. Of course the potential exists to abuse the skill of swimming in the performance of nefarious activities (such as the bombing of the USS Cole while in a Yemen harbor)--this potential does not provide a reasonable basis for outlawing swimming.
Of course this swimming analogy sounds silly--because it is. But it is actually no more silly than labeling recreational shooting and firearms as undesirable or criminal. It is largely a matter of culture and accepted understanding.
I have a slide-fire ordered for one of my firearms; once I test it our thoroughly, I will review it here. Meanwhile, I have only heard interesting things about it, and am in no way endorsing it as a viable product.